BurhaneoBY ATTRACTIVE AI
HOW IT WORKS

From imported claim to a documented human action.

Burhaneo organizes a review process around the issue, the source and what a claims specialist should investigate next.

01

Bring in claim data

Import claims and text-bearing clinical evidence. Authorized, secure data pipelines are needed for real patient records.

02

Run configured checks

Evaluate selected fields and supporting evidence against approved rules where available.

03

Review findings

Inspect the rule reference, cited source passage and any uncertainty or missing information.

04

Record a decision

Ask for documents, refer a clinical question, document corrections or record internal review.

On-screen example

Show the evidence behind the flag.

Instead of an unsupported red warning or rejection probability, an example review shows a possible authorization-reference gap, then a treatment-history passage with an illustrative clinical criterion.

This is not a live payer decision. The illustrative rule is not asserted to be a Saudi insurer policy.

Review of a fictional claim with cited supporting text
Ready for a controlled pilot

An evaluation, not a guess.

Before using the workflow in live hospital operations, rules and proposed actions should be compared with independently annotated historical claims in a security-approved environment.

01 /

Define the claim type and payer

Start with one bounded outpatient workflow.

02 /

Agree on expected findings

Clinical and RCM experts create the validation labels.

03 /

Measure outcomes

Review missed issues, false positives, source quality and reviewer usefulness.